11111

COURSE INTRODUCTION AND APPLICATION INFORMATION


mmr.fadf.ieu.edu.tr

Course Name
Code
Semester
Theory
(hour/week)
Application/Lab
(hour/week)
Local Credits
ECTS
Fall/Spring
Prerequisites
None
Course Language
Course Type
Elective
Course Level
-
Mode of Delivery -
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course Discussion
Critique
Jury
Application: Experiment / Laboratory / Workshop
Course Coordinator -
Course Lecturer(s)
Assistant(s) -
Course Objectives
Learning Outcomes The students who succeeded in this course;
  • Will be able to choose a strategy when assembling images and descriptions of the work and skills experienced during the four years of education.
  • Will be able to look for clarity of thought – in the work and in its presentation.
  • Will be able to refine, edit and organize projects, and construct simple and clear descriptions of the work.
  • Will be able to apply compositional techniques to graphic representation
  • Will be able to format format page layouts using a combination of digital and manual presentation techniques.
Course Description

 



Course Category

Core Courses
Major Area Courses
X
Supportive Courses
Media and Managment Skills Courses
Transferable Skill Courses

 

WEEKLY SUBJECTS AND RELATED PREPARATION STUDIES

Week Subjects Required Materials
1 Introduction to the course
2 Documentation Assignment #1
3 Documentation Assignment #2
4 How to prepare a draft Assignment #3
5 Porftolio draft Assignment #4
6 Message and Layout Assignment #5
7 Audience ,Cover and structure Assignment #6
8 Development of a Curriculum Vitae Assignment #7
9 MIDTERM Review. First Draft to be reviewed by outside guests.
10 Final paper quality selection and layout. Assignment #8
11 Text edit, cover material and binding. Assignment #9
12 Digital output of portfolio Assignment #10
13 Review of the semester
14 Review of the Semester  
15 Review of the Semester  
16 Review of the Semester  
Course Notes/Textbooks
Suggested Readings/Materials Katerina Ruedi Ray, L. L., Igor Marjanovic (2003). The Portfolio: An Architectural Student's Handbook. Oxford, Architectural Press.Linton, H. and S. Rost (2003). Portfolio design. New York, W.W. Norton.www.adobe.comwww.senecadesign.com/designgeek/indesign.htmlhttp://archinect.comhttp://www.deathbyarchitecture.comhttp://www.coroflot.com/public/helpportfoliotips.asphttp://creativecommons.org/

 

EVALUATION SYSTEM

Semester Activities Number Weigthing
Participation
Laboratory / Application
1
25
Field Work
Quizzes / Studio Critiques
Portfolio
Homework / Assignments
10
20
Presentation / Jury
Project
Seminar / Workshop
Oral Exam
Midterm
1
20
Final Exam
1
35
Total

Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade
12
65
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade
1
35
Total

ECTS / WORKLOAD TABLE

Semester Activities Number Duration (Hours) Workload
Course Hours
(Including exam week: 16 x total hours)
16
2
32
Laboratory / Application Hours
(Including exam week: 16 x total hours)
16
2
Study Hours Out of Class
9
2
Field Work
Quizzes / Studio Critiques
Portfolio
Homework / Assignments
10
2
Presentation / Jury
2
Project
Seminar / Workshop
Oral Exam
Midterms
4
Final Exams
1
4
    Total
106

 

COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS RELATIONSHIP

#
Program Competencies/Outcomes
* Contribution Level
1
2
3
4
5
1

Ability to apply theoretical and technical knowledge in architecture.

X
2

Ability to understand, interpret and evaluate architectural concepts and theories.

X
3

Ability to take on responsibility as an individual and as a team member to solve complex problems in the practice of architecture.

 

X
4

Critical evaluation of acquired knowledge and skills to diagnose individual educational needs and to direct self-education.

X
5

Ability to communicate architectural ideas and proposals for solutions to architectural problems in visual, written and oral form.

X
6

Ability to support architectural thoughts and proposals for solutions to architectural problems with qualitative and quantitative data and to communicate these with specialists and non-specialists.

X
7

Ability to use a foreign language to follow developments in architecture and to communicate with colleagues.

X
8

Ability to use digital information and communication technologies at a level that is adequate to the discipline of architecture.

X
9

Being equipped with social, scientific and ethical values in the accumulation, interpretation and/or application of architectural data.

X
10

Ability to collaborate with other disciplines that are directly or indirectly related to architecture with basic knowledge in these disciplines.

X

*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest

 

İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi | Sakarya Caddesi No:156, 35330 Balçova - İZMİR Tel: +90 232 279 25 25 | webmaster@ieu.edu.tr | YBS 2010